I can understand the appoinment is a power, but it is not the only power the Bishop has. It is in fact the lowest form of authority for our Bishop. It has however, become the most important form of power Bishops use. At least, people seem to think so because everybody seems to be deathly afraid of the Bishop moving them and sending them to the great beyond. It seems to me it has been used with great efficiency in order to prove authority and power by Bishops. Do we really need more of this kind of cheap and petty power mongering? I don't think so. For me, manipulating appointments is not the key role of the Bishop!
For me the key role of the Bishop is to safeguard the sanctity of our beliefs and theology from false doctrines and teachings! What if our Bishops started using all that power to discipline churches in the way it was intended. What if they started dealing with the pastors teaching untruths from the pulpit? This would be a positive and helpful use of their power instead of using it to make churches pony up or fall in rank politically. Isn't that the real reason we gave the Bishops all that power in the first place...so they can protect the church from false teachers and lies taught from the pulpit? The Bishops have completely and utterly failed us in this way! Not only do our Bishops seem to give a rip about the fundamental beliefs of our faith, they are often the ones trying to push for us to scrap them. Once again...the foxes are guarding the hen house.
Saturday, March 3, 2007
Thursday, March 1, 2007
More "Holy Conferencing" is not Going to Bring Us Together
I recieved and email from the DS yesterday and I was amazed. It was a forward from our Conference regarding an event the General Board of Higher Education and Ministry. Now, I preface this by saying that this is supposed to be the top of our organizational structure. The conference is always dogging us to support conference stuff and when I go to meetings and things at the conference level they seem to feel like the conference has really important things to add to the life of the church and they imply that we as pastors should want to get involved and be part of all the really important ministry they are doing.
Anyway, the email I recieved says,
Anyway, the email I recieved says,
Student Forum 2007, to be held May 24-27 at the University of Puget Sound in Tacoma, Washington will focus on holy conferencing and the General Conference process... "This year we are announcing a year of Jubilee from legislation instead of recieving and debating new legislation, students will have the opportunity to engage in Holy Conferencing with one another in order to better listen to and understand issues that are important to the church today," said Rev. Meg Lassiat, director of Student Ministries, vocation, and Enlistment at the General Board of Higher Education and Ministry, which sponsors Student Forum
Your welcome to look it up yourself at the UM web site for Student Ministries. I couldn't make this up. I guess I found myself thinking, "Is this what we are about?" Is our goal as United Methodists to make better politicians or to make Disciples? When I read the Gospels I don't see Jesus talking about parliamentary procedure anywhere! In fact, I don't see anything about conferences, voting, or resolutions except when the Apostles together voted on the apostle that was to take Judas' place after he hanged himself. Most everything was done by the consesus model. So here it is....
We are always hearing from the Conference how we should be attracting young people to our churches and how they want us to be relevant, but what is supposedly the best we have to offer...the General Conference is offering a retreat in the State of Washington(one of the most remote and obscure places in the country) and wants us to send students to this thing for the sole purpose of helping them learn how to be better bureaucrats? This is the best we have to offer? This is what makes the people in the pews sick and distrust our key leadership. We don't need any more argumentative, legalistic, debaters in the UM! We need young people who know and love Jesus...not the discipline. That is only going to happen when Jesus gets to be the center of what we do...without Jesus and him crucified at the center we are just making more pharisees.
Take a look at Passion for instance. They have been influencing thousands of young people in colleges from all over the world and what do they do at their conferences? They bring in the best speakers, preachers, and worship leaders the church has to offer. They focus on Christ and glorifying Him, they try to build up the faith and devotion of young people because they know if they love Jesus, then Jesus will help them discover truth. When I took some students to passion there was not a single legislative session or discussion about how we would win the world for Jesus through voting resolutions down or up. I came back so rejuvinated in spirit and ready to live for and share Jesus with the world. I ask you...what are these poor UM students going to go home with?
It is OK for us to be holding our key leaders accountable for what they do! They definitely feel they can hold us accountable. WE need to start asking them what these things have to do with Jesus. I sent an email to my DS about it because it is nearly impossible to find a way to actually talk to any one of these General Conference people...they simply are not accessable to me so I sent an email back to my DS asking her to pass on my dissapointment with the conference. It is not wrong for the people who are asked to pay the bills (my church paid almost 20% in apportionments last year) to ask people to be accountable for the funds and resources we send them to do the ministry.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Unity On the Cheap Side
I believe we have cheapened Christian Unity in the United Methodist Church by departmentalizing it and defining it by petty causes, crusades and the words of men. We have taken Christ out of the center and replaced it with literally God knows what. Just take a look at what we spend time talking about as a denomination and you will se what we think unites us. If you sat on the conference floor(at least in East Ohio) for an day and watch and listen to the arguments and resolutions and took good notes, I think at the end of the day when you asked yourself, "What does any of this have to do with Jesus and loving Him with all my heart, soul, and strength in real life?", the answer would be, "Very little."
We are so worried about our words instead of THE WORD! We spend so much time worrying about what phrases are in our rules and by-laws. It seems so pharisaic to me. It's like we are so worried about what we think we forgot to stop and look for what God really thinks about things! I just don't see us taking time to submit ourselves to Christ for direction because we are so worried about getting our own two cents down on paper for resolutions and the discipline. Just take a look at how thick our discipline is! I really believe many of us know our discipline better then we know our Bible and I hear far more about the discipline when we are together than I do about Jesus. Sometimes I think we believe Roberts Rules of Order came from the Bible...like we made up a new book.."The Book of Roberts." I have looked and it isn't in there.
There are consequences for replacing Christ with other things. I have thought long and hard about it and I would like to throw out what I believe are a few of the things that are consequences for not putting Christ first. Number one has to be distrust. Our pastors (myself included), have a hard time trusting each other because we do not know if the other people we are supposed to be working with really have the same goals we do. In fact, we know they don't so we don't trust them. Jesus said, "A house divided against itself cannot stand." (Mk 3:24 NIV) WE are divided by all of our agendas that may or may not really be about Jesus. If we really believed that the leadership of our church was most concerned about glorifying Christ and him crucified it would be the start of a revolution. But that is not what we see.
What we see are many of our key leaders moving away from Jesus as the center. A good example of this is Bishop Sprague. This Bishop of the United Methodist Church has gone to great lengths to spell out his basic beliefs in his book called, "Affirmations of a Dissenter." In print, he has clearly stated he does not believe in the orthodox substitutionary view of atonement. (pg.44) For those who may not know what substitutionary atonement is, it is the belief that the blood shed by Christ on the cross is able to justify us to our sins or pay for our sins. Bishop Sprague makes it clear that he does not believe the blood of Christ shed on the cross pays for our sins. He is clear he doesn't believe sins need to be atoned for. This can only be a stake in the heart of Christianity!
How can people who trust Jesus for their salvation follow such a person? Simply put, Christians believe these things and when the leaders of our denomination teach stuff like this how can we trust them? This is especially true when the other Bishops of our denomination are noticeably silent about it! By not dealing with it they affirm it, and the people in the pews see this and so do the pastors. It makes us question the trustworthiness of the people we follow who are supposedly safeguarding the theological integrity of our denomination. The foxes are guarding the hen house.
We are so worried about our words instead of THE WORD! We spend so much time worrying about what phrases are in our rules and by-laws. It seems so pharisaic to me. It's like we are so worried about what we think we forgot to stop and look for what God really thinks about things! I just don't see us taking time to submit ourselves to Christ for direction because we are so worried about getting our own two cents down on paper for resolutions and the discipline. Just take a look at how thick our discipline is! I really believe many of us know our discipline better then we know our Bible and I hear far more about the discipline when we are together than I do about Jesus. Sometimes I think we believe Roberts Rules of Order came from the Bible...like we made up a new book.."The Book of Roberts." I have looked and it isn't in there.
There are consequences for replacing Christ with other things. I have thought long and hard about it and I would like to throw out what I believe are a few of the things that are consequences for not putting Christ first. Number one has to be distrust. Our pastors (myself included), have a hard time trusting each other because we do not know if the other people we are supposed to be working with really have the same goals we do. In fact, we know they don't so we don't trust them. Jesus said, "A house divided against itself cannot stand." (Mk 3:24 NIV) WE are divided by all of our agendas that may or may not really be about Jesus. If we really believed that the leadership of our church was most concerned about glorifying Christ and him crucified it would be the start of a revolution. But that is not what we see.
What we see are many of our key leaders moving away from Jesus as the center. A good example of this is Bishop Sprague. This Bishop of the United Methodist Church has gone to great lengths to spell out his basic beliefs in his book called, "Affirmations of a Dissenter." In print, he has clearly stated he does not believe in the orthodox substitutionary view of atonement. (pg.44) For those who may not know what substitutionary atonement is, it is the belief that the blood shed by Christ on the cross is able to justify us to our sins or pay for our sins. Bishop Sprague makes it clear that he does not believe the blood of Christ shed on the cross pays for our sins. He is clear he doesn't believe sins need to be atoned for. This can only be a stake in the heart of Christianity!
How can people who trust Jesus for their salvation follow such a person? Simply put, Christians believe these things and when the leaders of our denomination teach stuff like this how can we trust them? This is especially true when the other Bishops of our denomination are noticeably silent about it! By not dealing with it they affirm it, and the people in the pews see this and so do the pastors. It makes us question the trustworthiness of the people we follow who are supposedly safeguarding the theological integrity of our denomination. The foxes are guarding the hen house.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
The IDEA of Christ is different than Christ himself. I have heard so much rhetoric surrounding the idea or spirit of Christ. What about Christ the man who was also a God? What about the man who was physically and brutally nailed to a cross and whose blood is able to wash our sins away. Whose blood can justify us to the sins that have held us in bondage and were destroying us.
Our world does not need the "spirit" or the "idea" of Christ...they need the resurrected Lord who bestows on his church the power of the Holy Spirit. They need a savior who is able to transform, guide, and deliver on his promises. And the church needs that savior too! United Methodists desperately need to know that the leaders of our denomination care about this risen savior. They don't need to know about Jesus as a sort of model boyscout. They need the incarnate Christ who spoke mercy to repentant sinners and condemnation to unrepentant religious people. United Methodists need to offer the world more than just an idea...we need to offer them Jesus.
I think that is part of what has been so frustrating at Annual Conference...it just seems like we are focusing on the nice idea of Christ, not Christ himself. If we were serious about a risen Christ I think we would take worship a whole lot more seriously! I think we would take ourselves much less seriously. We need to reclaim the incarnate Christ in United Methodism.
Our world does not need the "spirit" or the "idea" of Christ...they need the resurrected Lord who bestows on his church the power of the Holy Spirit. They need a savior who is able to transform, guide, and deliver on his promises. And the church needs that savior too! United Methodists desperately need to know that the leaders of our denomination care about this risen savior. They don't need to know about Jesus as a sort of model boyscout. They need the incarnate Christ who spoke mercy to repentant sinners and condemnation to unrepentant religious people. United Methodists need to offer the world more than just an idea...we need to offer them Jesus.
I think that is part of what has been so frustrating at Annual Conference...it just seems like we are focusing on the nice idea of Christ, not Christ himself. If we were serious about a risen Christ I think we would take worship a whole lot more seriously! I think we would take ourselves much less seriously. We need to reclaim the incarnate Christ in United Methodism.
Friday, February 23, 2007
Does Diversity Really Bring United Methodists Together?
When I was a student at United Seminary, I couldn't help but notice they had a statement that was supposed to define them and it said, " Unity through Diversity," It's funny how that statement has stayed with me over the years. At the time it seemed like a very strange thing to say and after years of pondering the meaning of it, it not only seems strange but ridiculous! In my opinion, unity does not come from diversity but despite the fact that we are diverse. Just look at Genesis and the tower of Babel. The people were working together and God realized if they all had the same language and goals they would accomplish much (Genesis 11:5-9) so he decided to give them diverse languages so they would not work together. Somehow in United Methodism we seem to have in some weird and almost indefineable way bought into the strange philosophy that being different makes us the same. Like somehow if we just celebrage being different it will bring us together! To me this is crazy. It would be like saying that school rivalries bring students together, or trying to say that the differences in culture between the European and Native American cultures brought them closer together, the differences between men and women make marriage easier. As I see it, this is obviously not factual. Just look at history and we can see diversity brings distance and seperates people instead of bringing them together. United Methodists have tried to use cheap slogans and the methods and tools of the world to bring us together..."Open Minds, Open Doors, Open Hearts." These cheap and cheezy slogans only emphasize my point...we count on the words and power of men to do what only God can do.
That is not to say that we cannot celebrate diversity! I think we should, but we cannot try to lift it up as the thing that brings us together because it isn't and to say so is simply misleading. What brings us together is a common bond. There is an old phrase that says, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." History bears this out and so does life. Only a common bond can bridge the huge gaps that divide our culture, our families, our friends, loved ones, races, nations, and even churches. Only a common bond could bring these diverse and unique things together for the common good because otherwise human nature will naturally try to seperate groups and organizations.
Paul understood this when he wrote, " You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:26-28NIV) I personally don't believe Paul got into this thing for the purpose of bringing equality to the Greeks, slaves, or women. I think he got into it because he had a real, legitimate encounter with Christ and it changed his life. Because he knew Jesus, he saw everyone as someone in Christ. Take Christ out of it and it all falls apart and Paul understood that. He understood the truth of the matter, it is Christ that unifies us and levels the playing field of race, sex, culture, class, and every other diversity we have. It is ONLY Christ that could do that.
Has anything changed since then? I would say no, nothing has changed since then despite the theologians who have tried to remove a crucified Christ from the church, despite attempts on our part to seperate out social issues from the Christ, despite bureaucracy, the discipline, and everything we do. The crucified Christ is still the reason we come together all during the week to serve and folks if it isn't; we are building on sinking sand.
That is not to say that we cannot celebrate diversity! I think we should, but we cannot try to lift it up as the thing that brings us together because it isn't and to say so is simply misleading. What brings us together is a common bond. There is an old phrase that says, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." History bears this out and so does life. Only a common bond can bridge the huge gaps that divide our culture, our families, our friends, loved ones, races, nations, and even churches. Only a common bond could bring these diverse and unique things together for the common good because otherwise human nature will naturally try to seperate groups and organizations.
Paul understood this when he wrote, " You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:26-28NIV) I personally don't believe Paul got into this thing for the purpose of bringing equality to the Greeks, slaves, or women. I think he got into it because he had a real, legitimate encounter with Christ and it changed his life. Because he knew Jesus, he saw everyone as someone in Christ. Take Christ out of it and it all falls apart and Paul understood that. He understood the truth of the matter, it is Christ that unifies us and levels the playing field of race, sex, culture, class, and every other diversity we have. It is ONLY Christ that could do that.
Has anything changed since then? I would say no, nothing has changed since then despite the theologians who have tried to remove a crucified Christ from the church, despite attempts on our part to seperate out social issues from the Christ, despite bureaucracy, the discipline, and everything we do. The crucified Christ is still the reason we come together all during the week to serve and folks if it isn't; we are building on sinking sand.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
What Really Unites Us?
I would like to suggest that it is not our discipline that unites us as much as it is our faith that unites us. So much of United Methodism is focused around the words of men...what we think...what we print...what we want. Has anyone really stopped to ponder what God wants? I think the first step for United Methodists to change is a sincere and heartfelt repentance to begin. We must stop worrying about pleasing each other or the world and start telling God we are sorry for not really caring what he wants or needs. We need a heartfelt time of confession and repentance for putting our agendas and our words above His Word.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)